For Your Class

For Your Class

discussion and essay
Civic Professionalism Reflective Writing and Discussion

Course: Democracy and Media
Institution: Olin College of Engineering
Faculty: Erhardt Graeff

 

The activity takes place over two class periods. The first class period offers a short lecture based on readings about civic professionalism from Harry Boyte and Albert Dzur. The lecture introduces civic professionalism as a framework for a civic-mindset and ethical and democratic practices in professional fields, and also connects this to the virtue of humility (specifically the pursuit of epistemic humility and epistemological pluralism in engineering work). I then ask students to imagine exemplars of civic professionals. They share and discuss these together in groups and as a class, deliberating about what makes for a civic professional.

Students then write a reflective essay on civic professionalism that extends their thinking about their exemplar and then looks prospectively at the potential of being a civic professional in engineering in their own career and how they imagine the relevance of humility to their future careers.

In the next class, students share their essays with a partner, reading and discussing them. I then scaffold the discussion to explore their hopes and concerns about being a civic professional in engineering.

This is the procedure for the discussion about being a civic professional in engineering.

 

Procedures for the discussion

  • Break into groups of 4–5 (mix with folks you didn’t pair & share with)
  • Discussion Questions
    • For the civic professionals in your essays, do you think their civically responsible activity is primarily a function of their civic virtue (i.e. their personal values and character traits emphasizing concern for others and the common good) or their perceived professional or civic obligation (i.e. a duty or required action of their position)?
    • What power might civic professionals in engineering be able to wield to make change on an everyday, perhaps "slow burn" basis?
    • What do you think about politics in engineering?
    • Can every engineer be a civic professional? Should they?
    • How do you imagine professional responsibilities and civic responsibilities overlapping or interacting in your own career? ○ What do you hope for? ○ What are you concerned about?

About 

Students in class: About 18

Teaching modality: In person

Grade level/year: First year

Course type: Democracy and Media is offered to first year undergraduate engineering students as one of several arts, humanities, or social science introductory courses they must choose in their first semester.

Virtues integrated: Integrity, humility, technomoral civility

discussion and essay
Civic Professionalism Reflective Writing and Discussion

Course: Democracy and Media
Institution: Olin College of Engineering
Faculty: Erhardt Graeff

 

The activity takes place over two class periods. The first class period offers a short lecture based on readings about civic professionalism from Harry Boyte and Albert Dzur. The lecture introduces civic professionalism as a framework for a civic-mindset and ethical and democratic practices in professional fields, and also connects this to the virtue of humility (specifically the pursuit of epistemic humility and epistemological pluralism in engineering work). I then ask students to imagine exemplars of civic professionals. They share and discuss these together in groups and as a class, deliberating about what makes for a civic professional.

Students then write a reflective essay on civic professionalism that extends their thinking about their exemplar and then looks prospectively at the potential of being a civic professional in engineering in their own career and how they imagine the relevance of humility to their future careers.

In the next class, students share their essays with a partner, reading and discussing them. I then scaffold the discussion to explore their hopes and concerns about being a civic professional in engineering.

This is the procedure for the discussion about being a civic professional in engineering.

 

Procedures for the discussion

  • Break into groups of 4–5 (mix with folks you didn’t pair & share with)
  • Discussion Questions
    • For the civic professionals in your essays, do you think their civically responsible activity is primarily a function of their civic virtue (i.e. their personal values and character traits emphasizing concern for others and the common good) or their perceived professional or civic obligation (i.e. a duty or required action of their position)?
    • What power might civic professionals in engineering be able to wield to make change on an everyday, perhaps "slow burn" basis?
    • What do you think about politics in engineering?
    • Can every engineer be a civic professional? Should they?
    • How do you imagine professional responsibilities and civic responsibilities overlapping or interacting in your own career? ○ What do you hope for? ○ What are you concerned about?

About 

Students in class: About 18

Teaching modality: In person

Grade level/year: First year

Course type: Democracy and Media is offered to first year undergraduate engineering students as one of several arts, humanities, or social science introductory courses they must choose in their first semester.

Virtues integrated: Integrity, humility, technomoral civility